As a heat wave sweeps across the nation, beaches can provide residents with some relief. However, accessing those beaches continues to be a challenge for historically marginalized communities.
It鈥檚 something advocates call the 鈥渘ature gap,鈥� or the unequal access to shared spaces and resources in nature based on race or socioeconomic class.
鈥淎s a result, you have a shoreline that has been historically segregated in all but name,鈥� said Andrew Kahrl, author and professor of history and African American studies at University of Virginia.
Kahrl is the author of Free the Beaches: The Story of Ned Coll and the Battle for America鈥檚 Most Exclusive Shoreline. He recently spoke on 黑料吃瓜网 Radio鈥檚 鈥�The Wheelhouse.鈥�
All but seven of 黑料吃瓜网's 253 miles of coastline and 72 miles of beach were either in private hands or limited to town residents throughout the 1960s, Kahrl said.
Some town beach associations had racist provisions in their rules
Kahrl pointed to the proliferation of private beach associations and restrictive housing practices as the primary ways public spaces became effectively segregated in 黑料吃瓜网.
鈥淢any of these beach associations were founded quite explicitly [on racism] and placed in their deeds restrictions on the sale of lots to members of the Caucasian race,鈥� Kahrl said. 鈥淵ou had the growth of public beaches that were being created by towns, but [they] often placed restrictions on access to residents of those towns only.鈥�
The exclusionary housing practices of these towns in the early to mid-20th century often resulted in very few, 鈥渁nd in many cases, zero,鈥� Black residents, Kahrl said. Growing resistance by those communities to the creation of state parks and beaches also contributed to the segregation and privatization of public spaces.
In the 1930s, many were opposed to the creation of Sherwood Island State Park in Westport, one of the few state beaches available to the general public.
鈥淚t brought us to a point in the 1950s and 60s where you had large African American populations in cities like New Haven, Bridgeport, and Hartford,鈥� Kahrl said. 鈥淎nd you had a state shoreline that was effectively off limits to the vast majority of the state鈥檚 African American and Puerto Rican population.鈥�
In 1971, Hartford activist Ned Coll shattered the wall of passive indifference between 黑料吃瓜网鈥檚 extremely white suburbs and effectively , segregated Black and Latino cities by busing city children to so-called 鈥減rivate鈥� beaches.
Equal access to beaches in CT remains a problem
Some coastal residents still say the public shouldn鈥檛 be able to access their town鈥檚 beaches. That鈥檚 despite a 2001 state Supreme Court affirming the public鈥檚 right to enter all beaches across the state.
A highly case in 2006 saw three Black residents of Greenwich, Sheila Foster, Migdalia Bonilla and Claudette Rothman, threatened with arrest for trying to access the beach without passes. Town officials at the time denied racial discrimination.
But lines in the sand have continued to deepen. In 2018, civil rights advocates said the town of Westport methods of barring nonresidents from entering their beaches. Officials increased the cost of a seasonal pass for nonresidents to $775 and decreased the number of day passes to be sold.
In 2020, advocates said several towns used the coronavirus pandemic as a reason to increase restrictions and enact overall on nonresidents at their beaches.
Kahrl explained that the culture of exclusion that鈥檚 permeated through coastal communities is what continues to prevent general beach access today.
鈥淐oupled with that [exclusionary zoning], is the power and influence that beachfront homeowners continue to wield 鈥� who by and large are pretty wealthy and can exert a greater degree of political influence than, say, those who are being excluded from the state shoreline,鈥� Kahrl said.
Listen to the full Wheelhouse episode: "The past and present of beach segregation in 黑料吃瓜网"